Legal Opinion
Rivett v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1994No. 60773-7PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The City of Tacoma appeals from orders of the Pierce County Superior Court granting summary judgment to Joseph Gundermann, Jr. and "Jane Doe” Gundermann, which declared Tacoma Municipal Code (TMC) 9.17-.010 facially unconstitutional as an unreasonable exercise of the City’s police powers and dismissed the cross-claim of the City against the Gundermanns. We accepted certification from the Court of Appeals, Division Two. We affirm the Superior Court.
Statement of the Case
Plaintiff in the trial court, Ms. Helen Rivett (not a party to this appeal), claimed that on June 24, 1988, she was walking on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Morris v. BlakerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.