Legal Opinion

United States v. Best

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 12, 2004No. ARMY 9701222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

MERCK, Senior Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members found appellant guilty, contrary to his pleas, of unpremeditated murder, assault in which grievous bodily harm was intentionally inflicted, and carrying a concealed weapon, in violation of Articles 118, 128, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 918, 928, and 934 [here*887inafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BestCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. T.O.B. v. C.J.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. United States v. BestCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  4. United States v. BestCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. Sergeant JAMES T. MURPHYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API