United States v. Best
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1ConcurrenceBaker, Judge
Dr. Galloway and Dr. Kirubakaran assessed Appellant’s mental condition while Appellant was an inmate at the Disciplinary *389Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. As recounted in the majority opinion, neither doctor assessed Appellant as suffering from a severe mental disease or defect. As a result, neither doctor treated Appellant for such a disease or defect. Dr. Galloway indicated in her assessment a suspicion that Appellant was malingering and that abnormalities in his behavior should be treated in the framework of custodial discipline and not as medical problems. However, there came a time…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.