State v. Crudup
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendant, Aries Crudup (defendant), appeals from a Superior Court judgment finding that he violated the terms and conditions of his probation. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on December 1, 2003, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and proceed to decide the appeal at this time. For the reasons indicated herein, we…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RiouxSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- State v. BouffardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. GautierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. ChristodalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- State v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
- State v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.