Legal Opinion

State v. Young

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1994No. CR 93-538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The State brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.10(c) from the dismissal of burglary, aggravated robbery, theft, and battery charges against the appellee, Chris Alvis Young. The State alleges the Trial Court erred in ruling, as a matter of law, that two witnesses were accomplices of Mr. Young and thus that he could not be convicted on the basis of their testimony alone. See Ark. Code Ann. § 16-89-111(e)(1) (1987); Foster v. State, 290 Ark. 495, 720 S.W.2d 712 (1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 929 (1987). The Trial Court ruled the witnesses were accomplices…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pilcher v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. HansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. State v. ZawodniakSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. ZawodniakSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. State v. ZawodniakSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. State v. ZawodniakSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API