Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1986No. CR 86-139PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree at her third trial. Her first trial resulted in a conviction which we reversed and remanded for a new trial. See Foster v. State, 285 Ark. 363, 687 S.W.2d 829 (1985). A mistrial was declared in the second trial. The appellant makes many arguments on appeal, but we reach only the argument that there was no corroboration of the accomplices’ testimony. We do not find any evidence in the record to corroborate the accomplices’ testimony as required for a conviction under the law; therefore, we must reverse her…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scherrer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. David v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API