State v. Zawodniak
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRay Thornton, Justice
While I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict acquitting appellee of simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms, I respectfully disagree that appellee can be tried a second time for the same offense. He was put in jeopardy, found guilty of the crime of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, and sentence was imposed.
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment states: “[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offence [sic] to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Article 2, § 8, of the Arkansas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.