Salamon v. Progressive Classic Insurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
This Court, on a number of occasions, has held that, under Maryland’s compulsory automobile insurance statute, contractual exclusions in automobile insurance policies that excuse or reduce benefits below the minimum statutorily required levels or types of coverage, and are not expressly authorized by the General Assembly, are invalid. Relevant to the present declaratory judgment action, the insured, a student employed as a part-time pizza delivery driver, was involved in a two car motor vehicle accident while on the job. His insurer, relying on a so-called “pizza exclusion” in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Remsburg v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Lee v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Progressive Universal Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Bowen v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.