Legal Opinion
Photostat Corporation and Lloyd Randall Ward, Jr. v. Harold E. Ball
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1964No. 7745PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
On this appeal, the defendant-appellant complains of the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial for failure of sitting jurors to fully answer questions propounded on voir dire concerning their acceptability to sit in the case. The pertinent facts are these.
The suit for personal injuries arose out of an automobile accident, and came on for trial in the latter part of 1963. In the course of voir dire examination by the court, the panel was specifically asked whether any member had ever been a plaintiff or brought an action against anyone else seeking to recover for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Robert Wade Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Leroy McCoy and Ladie Byrd Crawford v. Arthur B. Goldston, Jr., Richard Papciak and the City of Detroit PolicedepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Joseph R. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Albion William BodleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.