Leroy McCoy and Ladie Byrd Crawford v. Arthur B. Goldston, Jr., Richard Papciak and the City of Detroit Policedepartment
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for either an evidentiary hearing or a new trial. In support of their motion, plaintiffs argued that one juror failed to disclose information during voir dire concerning her competency to sit on the case. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for an evidentia-ry hearing.
I
Arthur Goldston, Jr. and Richard Papc-iak, two Detroit police officers, were on a routine patrol on October 17, 1974 in an area of Detroit which had an infestation of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Rose Ann Wilkerson, Ray Wilkerson and Sharon Sutton v. Harold Johnson, Fred Bush, Roy "Bud" Nail, Jr., and Lola WooldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- City of Richmond v. Madison Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William Julian HerndonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Paul Matthew Zerka v. Harlon GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.