Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Copening

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 27, 1992No. 66,234; CM 8702406PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

Appellant claims that he was prejudiced by an ex parte conversation between the military judge and trial counsel while appellant’s case was still pending at trial. For reasons set forth below, we reject appellant’s claim and affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review. *29Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, total…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Lewis Grieco v. Larry Meachum, WardenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Johnathan Davis Adams, A/K/A Jonathan David Adams, and William Bryan Jennings, A/K/A Bill JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  3. United States v. CaritativoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. HoltNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API