Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnathan Davis Adams, A/K/A Jonathan David Adams, and William Bryan Jennings, A/K/A Bill Jennings

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 31, 1986No. 84-3871PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

The issues in this appeal arise out of an ex parte conference of the district judge, the prosecutor, and a government witness. Such meetings are unusual and must be carefully conducted, especially in a criminal trial. In this case, however, an ex parte meeting was proper and appellants have shown no prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The charges against appellants stemmed from their participation in an auto theft ring. The jury convicted appellant Jennings of one count of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, one count of interstate transportation of a stolen motor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Wilson Arroyo-Angulo, Hugo Gomez, Jaime Rayo-Montano and Guillermo MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Shiyang Huang v. Equifax Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Daniel v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. United States v. William P. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Patrick L. SwindallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API