Legal Opinion

Turner v. Deere-Webber Bldg. Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Claude A. P. Turner against the Deere-Webber Building Company and the Deere & Webber Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, District Judge.

Plaintiff claims that the Deere & Webber building infringes claims 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 of plaintiff’s patent, No. 985,119, issued to him on the 21st day of February, 1911. The de*378fenses are: First, noninfringement; and, second, invalidity of plaintiff’s patent, so far as the claims above mentioned are concerned.

Claims 1, 4, and 6 of said patent were before this court in- the case of Turner v. Moore, 198 Fed. 134, and upon appeal before the Circuit Court of Appeals, 211 Fed. 467, 128 C. C. A. 138. The Moore structure involved in that case was substantially the same as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drum v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  2. Turner v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Turner v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. Lauter Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
  2. Turner v. Deere & Webber Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  3. Condron Co. v. Corrugated Bar Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1919
  4. C. A. P. Turner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API