Legal Opinion

Turner v. Moore

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Claude A. P. Turner against Morris E. Moore and Edward J. Scriver, copartners as Moore & Scriver. On final hearing. Decree for defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

WIEDARD, District Judge.

The only question which I shall consider is whether or not the defendants’ building infringes the complainant’s patent. Claims 1 and 4 of patent No. 985,119, issued to Turner on February 21, 1911, require: (a) A cantilever head; and (b) rods extending from said head downward into the column. The cantilever head has necessarily as a part thereof cantilever rods. Are the basket rods found in the Moore & Scriver building cantilever rods?

The slab is eight inches thick. (Defendants’ Record, Sandberg, p. 258; Johnson, p. 277.) Sandberg, the foreman, knows what he testified…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. Deere-Webber Bldg. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
  2. C. A. P. Turner Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API