C. A. P. Turner Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*649memoeandum by THE COTJRT
Plaintiff’s patents have been in litigation for many years. A review of the decisions is sufficient to disclose a. discussion of the same from practically every angle. Having carefully considered the present record, as well as the decisions hereinafter referred to, we find no necessity of going into the case in detail again. If, as we construe them, claims 4 and 5 of the patent in suit, the claims involved herein, do not include the circumferential cantilever head, or arrangement, illustrated and described in the letters patent, they are clearly invalid for want of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Drum v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Turner v. Lauter Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1918
- Turner v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Turner v. Lauter Piano Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.