Millbrae Co. v. Taylor
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; Wm. T. Wallace, Judge. Action by the Millbrae Company against H. H. Taylor and others to enjoin the nse of a trade name and for damages. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to enjoin the defendants from using a “trade name,” which it is alleged belongs to the plaintiff (a corporation), and for damages. Findings and judgment were against the plaintiff, and this appeal is taken from the judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial. An outline of the facts, condensed from the findings, may be thus stated: Some time prior to 1865, the defendant D. O. Mills became and still is the owner of a tract of land in San Mateo county, at the railroad station now, and ever since 1865, known as Millbrae station. From 1865 until August, 1883, A. F.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Siegert v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Pierce v. GuittardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Joseph v. MacowskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mulhens A. Kropff, Inc. v. Ferd Muelhens, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- Los Angeles Creamery Co. v. J. R. Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- New York Dental Parlors v. FroonIllinois Circuit Court · 1899