Joseph v. Macowsky
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated, in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— This action was brought to restrain the defendant from making or selling any razor having a stamp thereon, or upon the case thereof, showing the words “ Queen’s Own,” or the words “ Queen’s Own Co.”
The plaintiff alleged that he had been for many years importing razors, which he had caused to be manufactured in England; and in order that said razors might become known in the market and easily identified, and their origin known, he had caused each one of them to be stamped upon the “tang,” which is the thick part of the razor blade back of the cutting part, with the words, “ Queen’s Own Co.”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Fetridge v. WellsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Siegert v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Hobbs v. FrancaisThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
3Cited by9 opinions
- American University v. WoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919
- Ilo Oil Co. v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Castroville Co-Operative Creamery Co. v. ColCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Coleman, Burden & Warthen Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Millbrae Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.