New York Dental Parlors v. Froon
Illinois Circuit Court
Bill for injunction to restrain use of name similar to complainant’s. Heard before Judge Jesse Holdom.
1Opinion of the Court
Holdom, J.:
This bill is filed by the complainant, an Illinois corporation, against the defendants to enjoin them from using the name of complainant or what is alleged to be its trade mark,—which is in fact its corporate name—its form of advertisement, or from using any name or design similar to its name or trade mark, so-called, etc.
Froon and Simonds only have answered, the remaining defendants, (George S. Gagnon, New York Painless Dentists’ College, New York Painless Dental Company, Sophia Burton Gagnon), being names assumed by the answering defendants in their business as dentists.
It does…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Meneely v. . MeneelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.