Rogers v. Eaton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by Clinton Rogers and another against Martha Eaton for a sum due under a contract for the sale of land. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
This suit was brought to recover interest due on a certain land contract, amounting to $312, and insurance paid on buildings on the property, amounting to $7.33. A verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for these amounts having been directed by the trial court and judgment having been had thereon, the defendant brings the case here by writ of error.
On December 2, 1911, the defendant entered into a contract with plaintiffs for the purchase of certain lands located in the county of Eaton for $7,200, of which sum $100 was to be paid on the delivery of the contract and $1,900 on or before March 1,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Hanson v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Silfver v. DaenzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Feather v. Feather's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Mosher v. KittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adadow v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Stover v. WhitingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Fields v. KornMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Fields v. KornMichigan Supreme Court · 1962