Legal Opinion

Mosher v. Kittle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case was tried before the court without a jury, and comes before us on exceptions to the findings.

The husband of the defendant was a farmer possessed of a'farm of 160 acres. Alfred Mosher, the assignor of plaintiff, had been for many years in Mr. Kittle’s employment as a farm laborer. January 19, 1885, Mr. Kittle conveyed the farm by warranty deed to his wife. It was subject to a mortgage of $2,000. She subsequently executed another mortgage for $1,000, $700 of which she expended in building a house. The first of April, 1885, defendant informed Alfred that she had a deed of the place,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Menard v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rogers v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Barber v. Eberle's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Fox v. SchumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Foster, Charles & Ewen Co. v. FelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API