Mosher v. Kittle
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This case was tried before the court without a jury, and comes before us on exceptions to the findings.
The husband of the defendant was a farmer possessed of a'farm of 160 acres. Alfred Mosher, the assignor of plaintiff, had been for many years in Mr. Kittle’s employment as a farm laborer. January 19, 1885, Mr. Kittle conveyed the farm by warranty deed to his wife. It was subject to a mortgage of $2,000. She subsequently executed another mortgage for $1,000, $700 of which she expended in building a house. The first of April, 1885, defendant informed Alfred that she had a deed of the place,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Menard v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Rogers v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Barber v. Eberle's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Fox v. SchumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Foster, Charles & Ewen Co. v. FelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.