Legal Opinion
Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. USA Video Technology Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 31, 2007No. C.A. 06-387PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
On June 15, 2006, Time Warner Cable, Inc. (“TWC”) filed a complaint against USA Video Technology Corporation (“USVO”) seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of United States Patent No. 5,130,792 (“the '792 patent”), entitled “Store and Forward Video System.” 1 The '792 patent is directed to systems that transmit video programs to subscribers upon request, commonly referred to as video-on-demand (“VOD”). 2 TWC allegedly operates digital cable systems that provide VOD…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- West Gulf Maritime Association v. Ila Deep Sea Local 24, South Atlantic and Gulf Coast District of the Ila Afl-Cio, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Intersearch Worldwide, Ltd. v. Intersearch Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Shire U.S., Inc. v. Johnson Matthey, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Equipements De Trasformation IMAC v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Marquez v. Capital One Bank, USA N.A.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. v. GRECIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021