Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hart

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1938No. L. A. 15673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Pursuant to the allegations of the complaint herein, judgment was entered for the plaintiff decreeing foreclosure of a trust deed and sale of the property covered thereby, and the entry of a deficiency judgment in a sum equal to the difference between the amount of the indebtedness and the amount procured at the commissioner’s sale of the property. The defendants Hart appeal from that portion of the decree directing the entry of a deficiency judgment in such amount and contend that the trial court erred in denying their request for the appointment of an appraiser to determine the “fair value”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Leader v. CordsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. OleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Kirkpatrick v. StellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Burg Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API