Legal Opinion
Lincoln v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 1934No. L. A. 14787PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
This is an original proceeding in mandate to compel the respondent Superior Court to entertain and determine an action commenced therein to foreclose a deed of trust. A general demurrer to the petition has been filed.
Petitioner, as beneficiary under a trust deed, instituted an action in the respondent court on May 7, 1934, to foreclose the same. At the time the trust deed was executed, on February 24, 1933, no right o'f foreclosure existed in the absence of unusual and peculiar circumstances not here present. (Bank of Italy Nat. Trust & Sav. Assn. v. Bentley, 217 Cal. 644 [20 Pac. (2d) 940].)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Wilson v. StandeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- New Orleans City & Lake Railroad v. Louisiana, Ex Rel. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- 20th Century Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Strauch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Coppola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.