Legal Opinion
Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 1, 1995PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
HANDLER, Justice.
This case involves the scope of the entire controversy doctrine as it applies to joinder of parties. At issue in this' case, as well as, Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & Nehmad, 142 N.J. *285310, 662 A.2d 523, is whether the entire controversy doctrine applies to a malpractice action against an attorney who represents a client in the underlying transaction.
The case is before us as a result of a dissent in the Appellate Division. R. 2:2-l(a)(2). On appeal, the Appellate Division ruled, in a reported opinion, 274 N.J.Super.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Burd v. New Jersey Telephone CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Rycoline Products, Inc. v. C & W UnlimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Sklodowsky v. LushisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. GarronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & NehmadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.