Legal Opinion
William J. McLee v. Chrysler Corporation, Defendant-Movant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 12, 1994No. 94-8014, 94-3082PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
Pending before us is a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus directed to a District Judge considering an employment discrimination case. The circumstances giving rise to the motion are as follows:
The defendant, Chrysler Corporation, moved for summary judgment in the District Court. Judge Goettel denied the motion, but, in doing so, made clear that he was under the impression that this Court had precluded grants of summary judgment in employment discrimination cases, at least where the employer’s intent was at issue. Judge Goettel’s memorandum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- 65 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 824, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,272 Milton Woroski v. Nashua Corporation, Albert Skawinski v. Nashua CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Griffin v. Ambika Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Fierro v. Saks Fifth AvenueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.