Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Capachuni

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 29, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, J.

Action of tort in which the defendant appears specially and seeks to have the writ and action “abated” because of improper venue.

At the time of the argument on the defendant’s-“plea in abatement”, it was agreed between the parties that the plaintiff is a resident of Winthrop and that the defendant is a resident of South Boston.

As the action is described as one growing out of an alleged collision of automobiles, St. 1934, C. 387, Section 2, is applicable. That statute provides that such an action may be brought “in a district court within whose judicial district one of the parties lives or in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Paige v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Paraboschi v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Krock v. Consolidated Mines & Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API