Legal Opinion

Krock v. Consolidated Mines & Power Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1934PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract brought in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston to recover for printing work.

The plaintiff (doing business as the Boston Printing Company) testified, in direct examination, that as a result of a conversation with one Mabey he called at the office of the defendant, and there met Mabey and Walter S. Thompson and had a conversation with them. He was asked to “State the conversation . . . [hej had with Mabey and Thompson.” The defendant objected. The judge ruled that he would admit the evidence de bene. The plaintiff stated, in substance, that Mabey said he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Real Property Co. v. PittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Massachusetts Drug Co. v. BencksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Tighe v. SkillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Mass. Building Finish Co. v. BrennerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. East Hampton Bank & Trust Co. v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Del Grosso v. Board of Appeal of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API