Legal Opinion

Williams v. Brannen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1935No. 7989PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

This is a proceeding in prohibition to restrain the respondent, a justice of the peace, from trying the petitioner on a charge of violating Code, 22-2-63. If found guilty, the petitioner would be subject to a fine of from ten to five hundred dollars. He takes the position that the justice would be pecuniarily interested in the result.

Under Code, 50-17-14, the fees of a justice in misdemeanor cases not paid “by the parties” shall be “charged and recovered” as provided in Code, 7-5-15, the pertinent part of which follows:

“The sheriff shall enter all fines paid to him by justices,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Dugan v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Forest Coal Co. v. DoolittleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Brown v. EppsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Bagley v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Moats v. JancoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Shrewsbury v. PoteetWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Osborne v. ChinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API