Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bagley v. Blankenship

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1978No. 14181PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The ship of state seems to have entered upon a sea of troubled waters. The West Virginia Legislature, whose members are sworn to support the Constitution, is accused of violating the Constitution by decreasing five items in the Judiciary’s budget for fiscal year 1978-1979. The appropriation of funds for government operations and the enactment of the budget bill are clearly functions and responsibilities of the Legislature, but the Constitution, Article VI, Section 51, Subsection B(5), provides limitations on legislative action in the following language:

The Legislature shall not amend the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Brotherton v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Louk v. HaynesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State ex rel. Trent v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Frazier v. MeadowsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Myers v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Daily Gazette Co., Inc. v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Hamstead v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Randolph County Board of Education v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API