Canavan v. Canavan
New Mexico Supreme Court
Error to the District Court of Bernalillo County; Herbert F. Raynolds, District Judge;
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT.
ROBERTS, C. J. —
The writ of error herein was sued out on the 11th day of March, 1913. On the 18th day of April, 1913, the attornej'-s for the defendant in error joined the attorneys for plaintiff in error in a stipulation, which was filed in this Court. The terms of the stipulation are -not material to a decision of the question now before the Court. The fact that it was entered into and: filed, however, is important, because thereby defendant in error necessarily entered a general appearance in the cause, in this Court; such stipulation not being limited in this regard.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. LileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Dailey v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
- Green v. CastelloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Jones v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Marx v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fairchild v. United Service CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. McClaughertyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mundy v. IrwinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Abeytia v. SpiegelbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.