Legal Opinion

People v. Stokley

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1968No. Crim. 4692PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction after jury verdict of violation of Penal Code, section 470 (forgery and uttering).

Questions Presented

1. Alleged prejudicial misconduct of the deputy district attorney(a) in attempting to prove an alleged incriminating statement by defendant to a bail bondsman,(b) alleged reference to items which court held inadmissible,(c) Cross-examining defendant concerning his refusal to give exemplars of his handwriting.

2. No counsel at the lineups.

3. Alleged ineffectiveness of counsel.

4. Other contentions of defendant.

Evidence

Ronald Miekens,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. SesslinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. DorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. State v. MercerMontana Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API