People v. Stokley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction after jury verdict of violation of Penal Code, section 470 (forgery and uttering).
Questions Presented
1. Alleged prejudicial misconduct of the deputy district attorney(a) in attempting to prove an alleged incriminating statement by defendant to a bail bondsman,(b) alleged reference to items which court held inadmissible,(c) Cross-examining defendant concerning his refusal to give exemplars of his handwriting.
2. No counsel at the lineups.
3. Alleged ineffectiveness of counsel.
4. Other contentions of defendant.
Evidence
Ronald Miekens,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. FeggansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. SesslinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. DorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- State v. MercerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.