Legal Opinion

People v. Dorsey

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1974No. Crim. 1662PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

Appeal from judgments of conviction of two counts of violation of Penal Code section 476a (insufficient fund checks). Walter Osborn, Jr., Judge. Affirmed.

Because appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions, we will recite only those facts necessary to the issues raised.

In January of 1973, appellant made two purchases at the Sears store near Bakersfield, paying for both of the purchases by personal check. The first purchase of a set of radial tires was made on January. 27, 1973, through a Sears clerk named Miss Look, who testified…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. RhinehartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. CroweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Transport Indemnity Company v. SeibNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. OdleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. OttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. DemondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Hato Rey Stationery, Inc. v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  5. People v. LugashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API