Legal Opinion

W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Rotenberry

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1935No. 31895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellant is a manufacturer and seller of proprietary medicines, extracts, and the like. One Gibson was a local retail dealer for appellant, and appellees were the accommodation sureties on a contract of suretyship executed unto appellant in behalf of said local retail dealer, in which contract the appellant is referred to as the seller, and the local retail dealer as the buyer. The dealer or buyer failed to pay a balance said to be due by him to appellant, and suit was instituted against the buyer and the sureties. The proof showed that payment had been made for all purchases subsequent to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Finck v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bookout v. ShannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hederman v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Wingo-Ellett & Crump Shoe Co. v. NaamanMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  3. National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. CurrieMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Warren v. W. T. Raleigh Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API