Hederman v. Cox
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
On September 17, 1927, one Thos. E. Hand requested appellant, Hederman, to assist him in obtaining a loan of $1,577.52 at a bank. Appellant agreed to assist and offered to endorse Hand’s note for that amount, but Hand stated, in effect, that his bank credit was limited and that it would therefore serve his purposes better if appellant would give him appellant’s note, for the stated amount, made directly to Hand as payee, due one year after date, and that if appellant would do so Hand would give appellant Hand’s note, payable to appellant for the same amount and due on the same date.
This was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Gilliam v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Harrison v. Pike Bros. & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1873
- Meggett v. BaumMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
- First National Bank v. John McGrath & Sons Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elder v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Leaf River Forest Products, Inc. v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
- First Nat. Bank v. Mississippi Unemployment Compensation CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1945