Legal Opinion
Wingo-Ellett & Crump Shoe Co. v. Naaman
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1936No. 32225PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
In the. county court of Leflore county the appellant sued the appellee on a guaranty reading’ as follows:
“Greenwood, Miss. August 27, 1928.
“ Wingvo-Ellett & Crump Shoe Co. Richmond, Va.
“Dear Sir: I hereby guarantee every dollar George Samaha buys for the George Merc. Co. at Tchula, Miss, not exceeding $500.00:
‘ ‘ Sincerely
[Signed] Mrs. A. Naaman
“F. S. Ship to George Mer. Co., Tchula, Miss.”
The county court rendered a judgment against the appellee for the sum named in this guaranty, from which she appealed to the circuit court. In the circuit court the judgment of the county court was reversed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- W. T. Raleigh Co. v. RotenberryMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eac Credit Corporation v. E. L. King, Jess Porter and Joyce PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. CurrieMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Fletcher v. HutchersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1958