East St. Louis Electric Street Railroad v. Cauley
Appellate Court of Illinois
SlemoraiMhm.—Appeal from a judgment rendered by the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. B. H. Canby, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 3893, and affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court,
Scofield, J.
It is asserted, in appellee’s brief, that no exception has been preserved by appellant to any ruling of the city court, except as to the rendition of the judgment. We have examined the record carefully and have found this statement to be absolutely true. There is no exception on the part of the appellant to any ruling of the court in admitting or excluding evidence, or in giving or refusing instructions. FTeither is there any properly preserved exception to the ruling of the court in disallowing the motion for a new trial.
It has been repeatedly held that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James v. DexterIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Lee v. Town of Mound StationIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Dickhut v. DurrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
- Illinois Central Railroad v. ModglinIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Monroe v. SnowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wehrheim v. Thiel Detective Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
- Schanzenbach v. BroughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Zipkie v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- Browne v. NussbaumerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
- Farwell v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895