Legal Opinion

Schanzenbach v. Brough

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit for work, labor and services. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard at this court at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

The appellee sued the appellant for wages earned, as the appellee testified, under an employment never put in writing, for five years at $5 per day.

The appellant admitted the employment at $5 per day, but only by the day, not by the year, week or month. The appellant claims that he suffered by some irregularities on the cross-examination of the appellee, but the language of the bill of exceptions is simply at the end of each of several colloquies between court and counsel, “exception by counsel for defendant.” This is nearer to what is necessary than was the case in Arcade Co. v. Allen, 51…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. William Butcher Steel Works v. AtkinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Huddle v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. East St. Louis Electric Street Railroad v. CauleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  4. Arcade Co. v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Faircloth v. . KenlawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Norton v. . McLellandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Alexander v. Brewerton Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Lewinsohn v. StevensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API