Legal Opinion

Bucantis v. Midland-Ross Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 77-2054PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the motions of plaintiff Philip Bucantis, Jr. (“Bu-cantis”), for: (1) judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 and 59(a), respectively; and, (2) relief from judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) or, in the alternative, for leave to assert additional grounds in support of the motion for a new trial. For the reasons stated below, all of Bucantis’ motions will be denied; however, a new trial will be granted on the initiative of the Court, pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Beron v. Kramer-Trenton CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Beron v. Kramer-Trenton CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galvin v. Welsh Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Hardy Dotson, III and Dorothy M. Dotson v. Clark Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API