Bucantis v. Midland-Ross Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the motions of plaintiff Philip Bucantis, Jr. (“Bu-cantis”), for: (1) judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 and 59(a), respectively; and, (2) relief from judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) or, in the alternative, for leave to assert additional grounds in support of the motion for a new trial. For the reasons stated below, all of Bucantis’ motions will be denied; however, a new trial will be granted on the initiative of the Court, pursuant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Beron v. Kramer-Trenton CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Beron v. Kramer-Trenton CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Galvin v. Welsh Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Hardy Dotson, III and Dorothy M. Dotson v. Clark Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992