Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Mengel Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1937No. 1744PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeBLANC, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the lower court which sustained an exception of no right or cause of action and dismissed the plaintiff’s suit at his costs. Inasmuch as the plaintiff had been granted an order permitting him to prosecute his suit in forma pauperis under Act No. 156 of 1912 and its amendments (Act No. 260 of 1918, § 1, Act No. 165 of 1934, § 1), we take it that that part of the decree in the judgment which casts him with costs was rendered inadvertently.

The suit is predicated on a claim for compensation against the defendants Men-gel Company and one Willie…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Prevost v. Gheens Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Thibodeaux v. Yount Lee Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Murphy v. Ludlum Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern States Manufacturing Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Rogers v. Mengel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API