Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Mengel Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1939No. 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORE, Judge.
On May 19th, 1936, plaintiff filed this suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act No. 20 of 1914, alleging that he was employed by defendant, Stafford, a sub contractor for The Mengel Company, in the work of felling and hauling timber in the Bogue Chitte River Swamp in St. Tammany Parish; that following a layoff of several days’ duration, due to inclement weather conditions, he and other loggers were summoned by Stafford to report back to work on the morning of December 30, 1935, and that he accordingly “reported to said Stafford on the tract where the cutting was being…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Walker v. Lykes Brothers-Ripley S. S. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Rogers v. Mengel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Matter of Finnegan v. BiehnNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Babineaux v. GiblinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Laperouse v. McWilliams Dredging Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948