Legal Opinion

Humphreys v. . Finch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This was a civil action, tried before Boykin, Judge, at. September Term, 1886, of DavidsoN Superior Court. This action, begun before a justice of the peace on'January 30,1886, and, after trial and judgment against the defendant,, carried by his appeal to the Superior Court, is to recover the-balance due, after certain endorsed payments, upon the-following written instrument; $300. November 22d, 1884. One day after date, we promise to pay to the order of R. H. Humphreys three…

Read the full summary

This was a civil action, tried before Boykin, Judge, at. September Term, 1886, of DavidsoN Superior Court. This action, begun before a justice of the peace on'January 30,1886, and, after trial and judgment against the defendant,, carried by his appeal to the Superior Court, is to recover the-balance due, after certain endorsed payments, upon the-following written instrument; $300. November 22d, 1884. One day after date, we promise to pay to the order of R. H. Humphreys three hundred dollars at 8 per cent, interest. Value received. CHAS. L. HEITMAN, (Seal. J. W. PINCH, (Seal.) The defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

Sjiith, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). While the only specific issue submitted to the jury was as to the presence of the seal opposite the name of the defendant when his signature was affixed, and this is found against him, he was not allowed to prove the insertion in the space left open for the purpose, of a sum double that agreed upon between them. This evidence was not pertinent to the inquiry drawn up, and could only be competent upon a general denial of the execution of the paper. Except for this latter purpose, it was properly excluded, and this may have been the ground of the ruling…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Butler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Bland v. . O'HaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Maxon v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Beaufort Lumber Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Bank v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Cadell v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Creasman v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'NSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API