Creasman v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
This case was tried before a jury. In nonjury trials the motion for nonsuit has been replaced by the motion for a dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(b) ; in jury trials, by the motion for a directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). In a jury trial, the motion for a directed verdict is now the only procedure by which a party can challenge the sufficiency of his adversary’s evidence to go to the jury. Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.E. 2d 297. Defendant, therefore, mislabeled its motion when it moved “for dismissal on the grounds of insufficient evidence to go to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Melton v. Family First Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Sample v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Word v. Jones Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.