Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stroik

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1954No. Appeals, 256, 261, 290 and 291PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the lower court’s refusal to grant a new trial to the defendant who was found guilty by a jury of receiving stolen goods and contributing to the delinquency of two children. The appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions. The fairness of the court’s charge is challenged.

The Commonwealth’s evidence established that on December 5, 1952, Peter G. . . ., a 14 year old boy, and Terry A. . . ., aged 8 years, had broken into several places and had stolen money, a wallet, a hammer, a screw driver, some bullets, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JoyceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Commonwealth v. BubnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. People v. DritzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. RandallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. PankrazSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API