Ahern v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mercure, J.
Each of the claimants is a State Police Investigator or Senior Investigator who participated as a plaintiff in one of three es*9sentially identical actions (hereinafter the individual actions) that were commenced in Federal District Court in 1989. Pursuant to 29 USC § 216 (b), the individual actions sought to recover unpaid overtime compensation for the three-year period immediately preceding commencement of the action, as well as related declaratory relief, liquidated damages and counsel fees, based upon the State’s willful violation of the Fair Labor Standards…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Raper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Alston v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Schall v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Mulverhill v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.