Legal Opinion

Holland Construction Co. v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1952No. 4-9836PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McPaddin, Justice.

The ultimate question to be decided in this appeal is the right of the appellee to recover compensation payments because of the death of his natural father. To decide the ultimate question, we must consider certain provisions of our 1939 Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Statement of the Case

Mr. and Mrs. John E. Wooldridge had a son, named John David, born November 27, 1943. Mrs. Wooldridge died in September, 1945; and shortly thereafter, Mr. and Mrs. Sullivan took John David into their home as a companion for their little boy, Connie. In December, 1946, with Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Morris v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Nordmark v. Indian Queen Hotel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Polasky v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Kusiak v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. WR Fairchild Construction Co. v. OwensMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Snook v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Doyle's Concrete Finishers v. MoppinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Stephens & Stephens v. LoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API