Doyle's Concrete Finishers v. Moppin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
In this Workers’ Compensation case, we granted certiorari to resolve one issue—whether or not a minor child, not living with one of the parents and receiving only a part of his support therefrom, is subject to the partial dependency benefits of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1315 (c)(i) (Repl. 1976). In other words, is the child entitled to maximum benefits as a matter of law?
At the time of the divorce in 1976, the respondent, Jo Ellen Moppin, was awarded custody of their minor child and the deceased was ordered to pay child support in the amount of $108 per month. Following the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Roach Manufacturing Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Holland Construction Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bankston v. Prime West Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, ETC. v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Robinson v. Ed Williams Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Porter Seed Cleaning, Inc. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- Pinecrest Memorial Park, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.