Legal Opinion

Jones v. Flushing National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for an accounting, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint at the close of their case, and bring up for review so much of an earlier order, not appealed from separately, as denied their motion to strike from the answer certain denials, a defense and a counterclaim. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Plaintiffs established a case for an accounting on the trial (Toplitz v. Bauer, 161 N. Y. 325, 332; Gillet v. Bank of America, 160 id. 549, 560; Marvin v. Brooks, 94 id. 71, 75, 76; Jordan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Toplitz v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Stenton v. . JeromeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Jordan v. UnderhillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Raff v. Koster, Bial & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koziar v. KoziarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. De Vito v. PerilloNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API