Legal Opinion

Consolidated School District No. 15 v. Green

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1937No. 26923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST J.

Pursuant to a written contract, the plaintiff, Green, constructed a school building for the defendant, school district. The contract price was $34,634 and was to be paid out of the proceeds of a bond issue of $36,000 voted by tlie district. The record discloses that, the plaintiff was paid $34,433.13 and he filed this suit to recover what he claimed was the balance due pursuant to the contract with certain additions in the sum of $2,469.60. Judgment was rendered on September 19, 1933, and the recitals in part are as follows:

“That, plaintiff can only obtain judgment for the difference…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. McAdams v. LathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. National Surety Co. v. S. H. Hanson Builders' Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Davis v. BaumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Burba v. BurbaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API