Legal Opinion

Bunger v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1941No. 29739PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment which was rendered as the result of a trial upon the merits had after a judgment of default entered in the progress of the trial had been set aside.

The essential facts as reflected by the record will be briefly stated. On January 3, 1938, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, and others not here involved, to cancel an oil and gas mining lease, to quiet title to certain lands, and to obtain an .accounting from several defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Nichols v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Caldwell v. Indian Terr. Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Howell v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Waechter v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Olansen v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Krug v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. JI Case Company v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API