Legal Opinion
Olansen v. Texaco Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1978No. 48563PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Texaco commenced unitization proceedings under the Unitized Management of Common Sources of Supply Act (52) O.S. 1971, §§ 287.1 et seq.) in order to conduct secondary recovery operations by water flooding. Texaco was the sole lessee of all the minerals sought to be unitized. Pursuant to Texaco’s application, the East Glenn Unit was created by order of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, effective June 1, 1961, and Texaco was named the “unit operator”.1
Certain appellees (Olansens and Broom-halls), referred to as the Olansens, owned a 40 acre mineral interest included in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Eason Oil Company v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Hutchinson v. PfeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Thompson Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Clulow v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.